Appeal court overturns disabled-children's suit Mother seeking to lead class-action battle against government wants to fight on
The Globe and Mail
Nov 25, 2006
TORONTO -- Anne Larcade, the mother of a severely disabled son who has waged a six-year battle with the Ontario government over its treatment of the province's most vulnerable children, is now bracing to take her fight to the country's highest court.
Ms. Larcade lost the latest round yesterday when the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned a lower court ruling that would have allowed a class-action lawsuit to proceed against the government over its treatment of disabled children.
"I am devastated," she said. "But I am not prepared to give up. I feel very strongly that the government has to be held accountable and I believe justice will prevail."
Ms. Larcade, the lead plaintiff for dozens of families in the class action, has asked her lawyer to attempt to appeal the matter to the Supreme Court of Canada.
In its unanimous decision, the Appeal Court expresses concern about the limited resources available to the government and child-welfare authorities.
"To recognize a private law duty of care would expose Ontario to claims
for substantial damages by many families and individuals who believe
they have not received adequate services," Mr. Justice Robert Sharpe
says in the decision. "[The government's] priorities should be based on
the general public interest, not on the interests of particular
individuals, however difficult and sympathetic their circumstances may
In a nutshell, she said, the judicial system fails to see the harm that
can come from not keeping families intact and from forcing them to
relinquish custody in order to get treatment for a disabled child. Her
son, Alexandre, now 17, suffers from brain damage and a degenerative
neurological condition that is causing him to slowly regress. Ms.
Larcade narrowly escaped having to give up custody of her son after her
fight became a cause c.l.bre. Alexandre lives in a group home in
Dozens of other families were less fortunate. In a scathing report
released last year, Ontario Ombudsman Andr. Marin accused the government
of turning a blind eye to the problem. Following an investigation by the
Ombudsman's office, the government identified 83 families that had to
relinquish custody of a severely disabled child on either a temporary or
The problem dates back to the late 1990s when the Progressive
Conservative government at the time stopped using legislation designed
to provide a safety net for severely disabled children. The government
had passed legislation in the early 1980s on special-needs agreements to
support children whose needs are greater than can be met by their
parents. But the government stopped entering into these agreements in
1997, forcing families to relinquish custody to a children's aid society
in order to receive treatment. Without the agreements, children's aid
societies could not provide further funding for treatment unless a child
was made a legal ward of the society.
Mary Anne Chambers, Minister of Children and Youth Services, said the
Liberal government has invested more than $140-million in children with
special needs since taking office in 2003. She said the government is
focusing on only seeing children who require protection taken into
custody, not those who need treatment.
"It's really important for the public to know that children in need of
protection is the focus of our government," she said.
Mr. Marin said yesterday that 63 families have had legal custody
reinstated since his investigation. He also said complaints from
families to his office dropped dramatically after the government
invested $10-million in treatment centres for children.
"That made a big dent on the problem," Mr. Marin said. "But we're still
riding the government on it. We haven't abandoned the case."
New Democratic Party MPP Andrea Horwath called on the government
yesterday to restore special needs agreements.
What does "developmentally disabled; complex disabled or dual diagnosis" mean? Are adults or children always labelled?
A person who has a diagnosis of developmental disability is just as fully a person and a citizen as is any one else. He or she has the same range of likes and dislikes and character traits as any other person. Everyone has some limitations. People with developmental disabilities have limitations in their ability to learn and perform daily life skills. Some have other physical or emotional challenges. Often people who have developmental disabilities are less preoccupied with competition and success than is typical in our society, and they may have a keen sensitivity to relationships and a gift for celebration and for creating unity.
Complex Disabled is a person who has more than one challenge. For instance they could have autism, and also have Bi-Pollar. They have complex needs to serve rather than one label. The same pertains to dual diagnosis, which means there is more than one challenge.
LABELS- many children and adults to not actually have a diagnosis or label. This often times limits the available knowledge on treatment and diagnosis.
SNDW believes that people with developmental disabilities have important contributions to make to others, contributions that help to humanize our society.
Rhetorical Leadership in Framing a Supportive Social Climate for Educational Reforms Assisting Children with Disabilities
By Kathryn M. Olson Associate Professor Department of Communication University of Wisconsin . Milwaukee
A condensed version of this paper was presented at the Oxford Round Table, Harris Manchester College, Oxford University, Oxford, England, March 28, 2006.
Click here to download a pdf version